Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So it is fraud and useless both? Seems like it would have to be useful to be termed actual fraud.


It is fraud, which is why it is a useless example.


So is the example useless or the scheme? Because you have contradicted yourself twice in the last two comments.

If it is a useless scheme that would indicate that it doesn't actually save taxes by illegal means. If true, that means it is not fraud.

Otoh, if it does allow you to save taxes illegal, then it is not useless and could also be counted as fraud.

So it cannot possibly be useless and fraud at the same time.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: