That would be a pre-existing contract that the future IP holder would (or should... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		FireBeyond on Dec 8, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Pebble's next step That would be a pre-existing contract that the future IP holder would (or should, if written 'securely') be obligated to uphold.

elkos on Dec 8, 2016 [–]

Thanks hmm... that indeed sounds legit. Would definitely like to see that. If I have no open source alternative for a connected hardware device that seems to me like the next best thing.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact